Certification Prep
PMP Core Sprint — Exam lane in six weeks
Structured evening blocks that map every knowledge area to a delivery story you can reuse on the job.
- Duration
- 6 weeks · 2 live sessions per week
- Format
- Hybrid cohort
- Tuition
- KRW 1,890,000
Program narrative
This cohort treats the certification body of knowledge as a set of delivery checkpoints. You draft scope notes, build a risk register from a real scenario, and rehearse exam prompts with facilitators who still run multi-team releases. The pace assumes you already ship software or infrastructure work and need language that matches your day-to-day.
What is included
- Weekly live critique of your draft answers with scoring rubrics
- Printed workbook mapped to our internal scenario library
- Peer triads that rotate accountability for mock sections
- Office-hour blocks aligned to Seoul evenings
- Templates for stakeholder maps and traceability matrices
- Optional weekend deep dives on procurement wording
- Access to recorded walkthroughs for 120 days after close
Outcomes
- You can explain scope, schedule, and cost trade-offs in plain language.
- You leave with a personal checklist for every mock exam attempt.
- You can translate textbook terms into artifacts your team already uses.
Facilitator
Haneul Park
Program director who led release trains for logistics platforms across APAC.
FAQ
Do you include the official exam voucher?
No. Tuition covers instruction, materials, and mock feedback. You register for the exam directly with the provider when you feel ready.
What if I miss a live night?
Recordings land within 24 hours. You still submit your written attempt so coaches can annotate it before the next class.
Is this suited for hardware teams?
Yes, though most scenarios skew toward software delivery. Hardware teams should expect to adapt a few examples during week two.
Recent voice notes
“The mock debrief on procurement language mirrored how our PMO actually writes approvals. That specificity saved me hours of guessing.”
“Week three risk workshop finally made qualitative scoring feel usable instead of decorative.”